Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-30

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40970 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40970 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40970 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40970 of 2025 Vishal Pal .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shivam Shukla, Sushil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 46 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State. This is second bail application of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this court on 03.06.2025 by this court. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is a case of circumstantial evidence. The applicant has been implicated in this case because the last call was made by the deceased on his mobile phone. The C.C.T.V footage has also been collected but there is no F.S.L report of the same. It has further been submitted that out of 22 prosecution witnesses, only two have been examined before the trial court. The applicant is in jail since 27.06.2024 and has no criminal history to his credit. On the other hand learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 40970 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam