Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-21

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1876 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1876 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1876 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1876 of 2026 Sheela .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kali Shanker Tiwari Court No. - 66 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Kali Shanker Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.416 of 2025, under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 103(1), 351(3), 352, 333, 115(2), 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station- Paniyara, District- Maharajganj, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has nothing to do with the said offence. There are general and omnibus allegations against seven accused persons including the applicant. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that the role of causing the fatal injury to the deceased person has been assigned

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1876 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam