Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-20

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1634 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1634 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1634 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1634 of 2026 Sagar .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Adhar Yadav, Satendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 66 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Satendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.353 of 2019, under Sections 302/34 I.P.C., Police Station- Nanuta, District- Saharanpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. The FIR is delayed by about seven days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that initially the FIR was instituted U/s 147, 148, 302 I.P.C., but subsequently the final report (charge-sheet) was submitted against the applicant only that too U/s 304A, 427, 279 I.P.C., which are bailable, but on the prot

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1634 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam