CHELLAMMA & ORS. vs MURUGESAN

$~42 to 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21st January 2026 CM(M) 1294/2025 & CM APPL. 43140/2025 CHELLAMMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prateek Choudhary, Advocate through VC. versus MURUGESAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. M. Kumaresan, Advocates. 43 CM(M) 1314/2025 & CM APPL. 43475/2025 MR. KANDASWAMY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prateek Choudhary, Advocate through VC. versus MR. MURUGESAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. M. Kumaresan, Advocates. 44 CM(M) 1352/2025 & CM APPL. 44455/2025 MR. KANDASWAMY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prateek Choudhary, Advocate through VC. versus MR. MURUGESAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. M. Kumaresan, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Santosh Kr. Rout, SC for R-3. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the common impugned order dated 22nd October, 2025, passed by the trial court in CS DJ No. 118/2019, CS DJ No. 1097/2018 and CS DJ No. 1117/2018, whereby the evidence of the petitioners has been closed. 3. I hav