Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-29

BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs RAJENDER @ BUNTY

Citation / case number
MAC.APP.-517/2018 2026:DHC:690
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
Respondent
RAJENDER @ BUNTY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 13th January 2026 Pronounced on : 29th January 2026 Uploaded on : 30th January 2026 MAC.APP. 517/2018 & CM APPL. 22859/2018 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.....Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. versus RAJENDER @ BUNTY .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs. MAC.APP. 799/2019 RAJENDER @ BUNTY .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Mr. Ritik Singh, Advs. versus BHARTI AXA GEN INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL JUDGMENT ANISH DAYAL, J. 1. These appeals have been filed by insurance company and the claimant respectively. The Insurance company has filed the appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (‘MV Act’), seeking to set aside the 2016. Whereas the claimant has filed cross-objections to the same under Order XLI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking enhancement of the award. 2. The appeal filed by the insurance company is essentially on the ground that the Tribunal awarded exorbitant compensation under the heads of non-pecuniary damages, i.e. loss of expectati