ARVIND PRAVINKUMAR MEHTA vs THE APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

Judgment text excerpt

wp2892-25.doc Digitally signed by TRUSHA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date: 2026.01.19 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 17:47:16 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.2892 OF 2025 Arvind Pravinkumar Mehta .. Petitioner Versus The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee .. Respondent Mr.Vishal Kanade and Mr.Janay Jain a/w Mr. Ashwin S. Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Aparna D. Vhatkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1-AGRC Ms.Ravleen Sabharwal a/w Ms. Aarushi Yadav and Mr. Prakhar Tandon, Advocate for the Resondent Nos. 2 & 3-SRA Mr.Shashikant Surana a/w Mr. Madhur Surana, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. RESERVED ON: DECEMBER 17, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: JANUARY 19, 2026 JUDGEMENT:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of parties. Mohite 1/20 wp2892-25.doc 2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following final reliefs: (a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ / Order / Direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to quash, set aside the impugned order dated 06.05.2025 passed by respondent No.1 (Exhibit-C); (b) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ / Order / Direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to quash, set aside the Impugned order dated 31.12.2024/ 01.01.2025, passed by the Respondent No.2 (Exhibit-A) and the Petitioner Petition may be allowed in the interest of justice; (c) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain respondent No.3 from permitting any change/modification in the approved plan dated 19.05.2023 to the extent of shifting of permanent alternate accommodation of the petitioner from Shop No.3 of the subsisting approved plan to any other shop or port