Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-27

ARUN MEHROTRA AND ANR vs KISHAN LAL

Citation / case number
FAO (COMM)-123/2023 2026:DHC:600-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ARUN MEHROTRA AND ANR
Respondent
KISHAN LAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 13.01.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 27.01.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 27.01.2026 FAO(COMM.) 123/2023 ARUN MEHROTRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Tushar Mahajan, Mr. Bhaavan Mahajan and Mr. Tanmay S. Surana, Advs. versus KISHAN LAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Khurana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, the Appellant (Petitioner before the learned District Judge) assails the correctness of the Judgment and Order dated 27.03.2023 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Order‟], whereby the learned District Judge dismissed the petition filed by the Appellant under Section 342 of the A&C Act, on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction without looking into the merits of the matter of the Award dated 02.11.2018 [hereinafter referred to as „the Award‟] passed by the learned Arbitrator. 1 A&C Act 2 Section 34 2. Herein, the Appellant contends that the learned District Judge, after completion of the pleadings and after discussing the merits o