ARUN KUMAR GAUTAM vs STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4762/2025 ARUN KUMAR GAUTAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibek Tripathi and Mr. Sudhakar Tiwari, Advocates. versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2023 of PS Greater Kailash for offence under Section 419 /420 /448 /465 /467/468 /471 /120B IPC. 2. The investigating officer has not reached, which conveys an impression that police does not want to oppose this bail application. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State. 3. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case as borne out of record is that the complainant de facto lodged a complaint alleging that the immovable BAIL APPLICATION 4762/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.01.14 17:31:38 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:14.01.2026 17:46:07 property which is a subject matter of dispute was owned by his mother Smt. Rajkumari and was never sold away to anyone. Another complaint was filed by one Ms. Sonia Jain alleging that she had purchased the subject property from Smt. Raj Kumari through registered Sale Deed dated 08.04.2022 but the accused/applicant and his family members were not vacating the same. Later on, the accused/applicant allegedly accepted Rs.50,00,000/- and