AMIT YADAV vs THE STATE ( N.C.T OF DELHI ) & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08th January, 2026 CRL.M.C. 156/2026 & CRL.M.A. 529/2026 & CRL.M.A. 530/2026 & CRL.M.A. 531/2026 AMIT YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suresh Chand, Advocate (through V.C.) versus THE STATE ( N.C.T OF DELHI ) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Prajjwal, PS Prem Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. An FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner-Amit Yadav for commission of offences under Section 323/341/34 IPC. 2. According to complainant, he was hit with a brick and the police should have rather registered a case for commission of offence under Section 308 IPC. He contends that the police has deliberately diluted the offence and did not even bother to collect the relevant CCTV footage which would have, clearly, indicated the intention and knowledge aspect on the part of the concerned accused persons. 3. The charges have already been framed for commission of offences under Section 323/341/34 IPC. 4. Petitioner, feeling aggrieved by order dated 16.03.2024, passed by the learned Trial Court whereby the charges were ascerta