AMIT SAXENA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 + CRL.M.C. 329/2026, CRL.M.A. 1246/2026, 1248/2026 & 1247/2026 AMIT SAXENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Azad Khokher, Advocate with petitioner in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with W/SI Surbhi Aggarwal, PS Punjabi Bagh Mr. Sanser Pal Singh and Ms. Kritika Tyagi, Advocate for R2&3 with respondents in person CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 1001/2021 of PS Punjabi Bagh for offence under Section 363/376 BNS & Section 4 POCSO Act on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. Learned APP for State accepts notice and submits that the State has no serious objection in view of peculiar facts of this case. Crl. M.C. 329/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af39 62c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b4 Signature Not Verified 0f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.01.15 19:12:52 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:15.01.2026 19:32:19 3. Respondents no. 2 and 3 who appear on advance intimation accept notice. They are identified by IO/SI Surbhi Aggarwal and are accompanied with their counsel. 4. I have spoken in Hindi with the petitioner and respondents no. 2 and 3. They have appeared with infant child of petitioner and respondent no.2. Respondent no. 3 is father of respondent no. 2. It is stated by all of them that petitioner and respondent