Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-07

AMAR BAHADUR vs STATE

Citation / case number
CRL.A.-388/2002 2026:DHC:314-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
AMAR BAHADUR
Respondent
STATE
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 15th January, 2026 CRL.A. 388/2002 AMAR BAHADUR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Tej Singh Varun – Amicus Curiae along with Ms. Pooja Kumari, Advs. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Ms. Divya Yadav, Adv. Mr. Nitin Rai Sharma, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT MADHU JAIN, J. 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present criminal appeal arises out of judgment dated 22nd January, 2002(hereinafter, ‘the impugned judgment’) and order of sentence dated 24th January, 2002 (hereinafter, ‘the impugned order of sentence’), passed by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 59/99 titled ‘State v. Amar Bahadur’, arising from FIR No. 357/98, registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, ‘IPC’) at PS Keshav Puram. 3. The brief facts that are relevant for the present appeal are that an incident took place on 19thOctober, 1998 at M.D. Exports, C-34 Industrial Area, Lawrence Road. The said premises is a factory where several workers, including the deceased as well as the Appellant used t