ZULFIKAR & ORS. vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~41 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 5th February, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 234/2026 ZULFIKAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohd. Ajmal, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocate for State SI Vijay, P.S. Seemapuri. Mr. Mohd. Shariq with Mr. Rishi Vohra and Mr. Amit Kharbanda, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3 with Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 239/2026 SALEEM AHMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohd. Shariq with Mr. Rishi Vohra and Mr. Amit Kharbanda, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocate for State SI Vijay, P.S. Seemapuri. Mr. Mohd. Ajmal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 6 with respondent Nos.2 to 6 in person. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. There are two cross-cases and the abovesaid two petitions have been Signature Not Verified W.P.(CRL) 234/2026 & 1 Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL W.P.(CRL) 239/2026 Signing Date:07.02.2026 12:29:43 filed seeking quashing of both such cross-FIRs 2. In W.P.(CRL) 234/2026, all the three petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.11/26, dated 10.01.2026, registered at Police Station Seemapuri for commission of offences under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/351(2)/3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 341/323/506/34 IPC), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. The alleged injured i.e. respondent No.2 - Saleem Ahmad is present in Court and respondent No.3 - Saqib Qureshi has joined the proceedings thro