WRIT - C No. 7348 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 7348 of 2026 Hridai Narain Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Shreyansi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the year 2003, various orders had been passed by the revenue authorities for removal the encroachment, hence the petitioner has preferred the present petition. 2. Nothing has been stated in the entire writ petition nor any argument has been raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that what prejudice has been caused to the petitioner for non-compliance of the aforesaid orders and what is the locus of the petitioner to file present petition. 3. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Jasbhai Motibhai Desai Vs. Roshan Kumar, Haji Bashir Ahmed reported in 1976 (1) SCC 671 held that a stranger who is not an aggrieved person cannot maintain a Writ for either Certiorari or Mandamus. The relevant paragraph of the aforesaid judgment is reproduced hereunder:- "50. While a Procrustean approach should be avoided, as