Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-19

WRIT - C No. 6799 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 6799 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 6799 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 6799 of 2026 Jiyalal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Singh, Shyam Sunder Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2- Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil-Mehnagar, District- Azamgarh to decide restoration application dated 13.02.2024 filed in Case No.31 of 2006-07, Computer Case No.T2006156516 expeditiously. 4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in

WRIT - C No. 6799 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam