Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-18

WRIT - C No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 6673 of 2026 Pardeshi .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adya Prasad Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.2/Additional Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil, Sadar, District, Gorakhpur to decide the Suit No. 699 of 1982 being Computerized Case No. T202005310300050) Ram Prasad Vs. Sahati and others expeditiously. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that original suit was filed under Section 229-B of the U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act, 1950, which is pending consideration before the respondent no. 2/Additional Sub- Divisi

WRIT - C No. 6673 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam