Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - C No. 6024 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 6024 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 6024 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 6024 of 2026 Janak Singh And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Panchu Ram Maurya, Shashank Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Deepak Gaur Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Against the orders which are under challenge in the present petition before this Court, statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioner as provided under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2. This fact is not denied by learned counsel for the petitioner 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. (Prakash Padia,J.) February 27, 2026 saqlain Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - C No. 6024 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam