Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-11

WRIT - C No. 5293 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 5293 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 5293 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 5293 of 2026 Hansmukhi Begum .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M. Asif, Ravi Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, District Etawah to decide the representation dated 14.01.2026 under Section 24 of U.P. Land Revenue Code 2006, within stipulated period. 4. It is argued by the counsel for the petitioner that as per provisions contained under Sub- Section (3) of Section 24 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, such kind of applications should be decided within a time bound period. Sub Section (3)

WRIT - C No. 5293 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam