Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-05

WRIT - C No. 4627 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 4627 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 4627 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4627 of 2026 Mukesh Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vipan Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition to direct the Respondent No.2, namely, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehil Kuraoli, District Mainpuri to decide the ejectment case filed under Section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Case No. 1322 of 2024 (Mukesh Yadav and others Versus Amir Singh and others), Case No. 1323 of 2024 (Mukesh Yadav and others Versus Naresh Bhadeai) pending in the court of respondent no.2 within stipulated period. 4. Heard counsel for the parties present and perused the record. 5. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally directing the Respondent No.2, namely, Sub Div

WRIT - C No. 4627 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam