Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - C No. 4532 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 4532 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 4532 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4532 of 2026 Jai Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. In the proceedings initiated by the Respondent No.5/ Jokhan Prasad under Section 67-A, an order dated 02.11.2017 was passed in his favour by the Respondent No.3. 2. Aggrieved against the aforesaid, revision under Section 210 of the Code, 2006 was filed by the petitioner after more than 4 years. The said revision was rejected by the Respondent No.2 vide order dated 24.10.2025. 3. Aggrieved against the aforesaid, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition. 4. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. From perusal of records it appears that the specific cogent findings were recorded by the Respondent No.2 that petitioner does not fall within the definition of 'person aggrieved'. The relevant portion of the order passed by the Respondent No.2 reads as follows:- "उक्त आदेश से निगरानीकर्ता कैसे तथा किस प्रकार छु ब्ध है तथा उक्त भूमि पर उनकी क्या हितबद्धता है, इस सम्बन्ध में उनके द्वारा कोई साक

WRIT - C No. 4532 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam