Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-04

WRIT - C No. 4344 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 4344 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 4344 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4344 of 2026 Ranjeet Sahani .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2-Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil-Khorabar, District Gorakhpur to decide Mutation Case No.21748 of 2025, Computer Case No.202505310321748 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an application filed under sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, is pending since long. At this stage it would be apt and appropriate to note sub

WRIT - C No. 4344 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam