Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - C No. 3670 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3670 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3670 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3670 of 2026 Lallan Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiraj Singh, Mina Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2026, was filed by the petitioner before the respondent no. 3 namely ________ on 26.12.2026, but till date no decision has been taken. From perusal of the aforesaid application, this Court is a prima facie opinion that the said application was not filed as per the procedure prescribed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2026, In view of this matter, the petitioner is permitted to move a proper application before the respondent no. 3. If such application is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 3, will decide the same expeditionary in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is finally disposed of. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the pr

WRIT - C No. 3670 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam