Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - C No. 3608 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3608 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3608 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3608 of 2026 Devendra Kumar Pathak And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Tehsildar (Judicial),Tehsil Koil And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manvendra Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The only relief sought by the petitioners in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to direct the respondent no. 1 namely Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Koil, District Aligarh, to decide the Restoration Application dated 06.03.2024 in Case No. 09 of 2002 (State Vs. Kundan Lal), under Section 186 of the U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act, expeditiously within specific period. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 4. From perusal of the record in transpires that nothing has

WRIT - C No. 3608 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam