Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-20

WRIT - C No. 3534 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3534 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3534 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 3534 of 2026 Kale Ram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghav Nayar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut as respondent No.16 in the array of the respondents during the course of the day. 2. Heard Shri Navin Sinha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Raghav Nayar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1, 2, 3 & 16 and Shri Sunil Kumar Singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.15. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private respondents. 4. Proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was initiated by the petitioner which was numbered as Case No.6194 of 2022, Computerized Case No.T202211280306194. The same was dismissed by the Respondent No.3, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Loni, Ghaziabad vide order dated 24.01.2025 on the ground that in place of moving an applicati

WRIT - C No. 3534 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam