WRIT - C No. 2944 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2944 of 2026 Sunita Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shweta Nishad, Stuti Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2 to decide Case No.30318 of 2025 as well as Computerize Case No.T202505310330318 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an application filed under sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, is pending since long. At this stage it would be apt and appropriate to note sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, which mandat