Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - C No. 2332 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2332 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2332 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2332 of 2026 Vikrama And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Singh, Ashok Mishra, Shreeprakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The only relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to direct the respondent no. 2 namely Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil, Sagri, District Azamgarh, to finally decide the Appeal bearing Computerized No. T- 202415060701945 (Sriram Versus Ram Sakal) Case No. 1945 of 2024, under Section 35(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, and other connected appeals, expeditiously within specific period. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 4. From perusal of

WRIT - C No. 2332 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam