Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - C No. 2179 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2179 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2179 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2179 of 2026 Smt Shanti Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mani Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The only relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to direct the respondent no. 2 namely the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj Division Prayagraj) to decide the Appeal/Case No. 2676 of 2024 Computerized Case No. C202402000002673 (Dashrath & Ors. Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi & Ors.) under Section 24(4) U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 4. From perusal of the record in

WRIT - C No. 2179 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam