Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-06

WRIT - C No. 2034 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 2034 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 2034 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 2034 of 2026 Jahid Ali .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Other .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Subodh Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Subodh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kartikeya Saran, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Vijay Shankar Prasad, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The proceedings initiated against the petitioner on the application filed by the respondent Nos.5 & 6 which was registered as Case No.2300 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.D202412070002300) (Mujjakr Ali Vs. Zahid Ali). In the aforesaid proceedings, order has been passed by the respondent No.3/Additional Collector (Finance & Revenue), Budaun on 29.7.2025 by which lease deed granted to the petitioner has been cancelled. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the lease was granted in favour of the petitioner in the year 1996 and after more than 28 years, a person who does not fall within a definition of "Person Aggrieved" proceedings were

WRIT - C No. 2034 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam