Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-23

WRIT - C No. 1868 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1868 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1868 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1868 of 2026 Kumud Rice And Daal Mill Thru.Partner Sanjeev Kuamr Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Agriculture Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Akshat Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surendra Kumar Singh Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims to have deposited an amount of Rs. 10,35,851/- as advance with opposite party No.2. He wants its adjustment towards Mandi fee and Development Cess for purchase of paddy and other business transactions done by the petitioner's Firm in the Financial Year 2023-24 and in this context he has submitted a representation dated 13.01.2024. 3. Counsel for the Mandi Parishad says that opposite party No.3 is competent to consider the said representation. Let the opposite party No.3 consider and take a decision on the aforesaid representation, if there is no other legal impediment, within two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ

WRIT - C No. 1868 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam