Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-23

WRIT - C No. 1851 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1851 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1851 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1851 of 2026 Tanzeemul Makatib Registered Sanstha Thru. Manager Sagheerul Hasan Rizvi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Nagar Vikas Vibhag . Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lokendra Kumar Gupta, Mirza Humayun Qadar, Ravendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shailendra Singh Chauhan Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate on behalf of respondent No.2 to 4 is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. The petitioner has challenged a notice dated 22.04.2024 issued under Section 222 of the U.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1959') eliciting certain information for the purposes of assessment of tax under the Act, 1959. The petitioner claims to have submitted his response vide Annexure No.7, however, learned Counsel for the Nagar Nigam says that in the notice itself there were blanks/spaces which had to be filled by the petitioner and returned for the purposes of assessment which has not been done. The petitioner claims to have submitted t

WRIT - C No. 1851 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam