Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-10

WRIT - C No. 1326 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 1326 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 1326 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1326 of 2026 Romila Verma .....Petitioner(s) Versus U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Rajya Niyojan Santhan Thru. Its Chairman And Another ..... Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surangama Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shobhit Mohan Shukla Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Surangama Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the RERA. 2. This petition has been filed by one of the allottees to a project, which was earlier being promoted by 12 promoters, however, proceedings took place under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code before the National Company Law Tribunal wherein resolution plan has been approved vide order dated 27.02.2023. 3. The petitioner claims that he is mentioned as an allottee in the project in said order of the NCLT and in those very proceedings the opposite party no. 2 was allowed to step into the shoes of the earlier promoters. Now the new promoter i.e. opposite party no. 2 is seeking extension of the registration of the pr

WRIT - C No. 1326 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam