Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-09

WRIT - C No. 12685 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 12685 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 12685 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12685 of 2025 Garima Dixit .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Puneet Chandra, Rama Pati Shukla, Shobhit Mohan Shukla Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by the non-execution of the recovery certificate issued by U.P.R.E.R.A. against respondent no.4, has filed the present writ petition. Learned counsel for respondent no.4, Sri R.P. Shukla says that the amount awarded by U.P.R.E.R.A. has been deposited before it, as per the calculation of its chartered accountant. However, the counsel for the petitioner says that the entire amount has not been deposited. Sri Mahendra Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State says that in view of the stand of respondent no.4, Awas Vikas, the entire money has been deposited before U.P.R.E.R.A. and the recovery certificate has been returned back. In view of the aforesaid, if the petitioner has any grievance, she can raise it before U.P.R.E.R.A. and pursue such r

WRIT - C No. 12685 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam