Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - B No. 927 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 927 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 927 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 927 of 2026 Makhmal And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Ratn Kumar Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 Assistant Consolidation Officer, Devband, District Saharanpur to decide the petitioners' objection under section 9Ka (2) U.P.C.H. Act regarding Khata No. 38, 41, 44, 45, 55, 57, 76, 180 Village- at Chandena Koli, Nagarl, Tehsil- Devband, District Saharanpur, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned respondents not to distribute the Form-23, till deciding the petitioners' objection of U.P.C.H.Act, under section 9 (2) (Ka) pending before respondent no.2." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as

WRIT - B No. 927 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam