Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - B No. 889 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 889 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 889 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 889 of 2026 Raj Deo And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Board Of Revenue And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Yadav, Arun Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1.Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shailesh Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for gaon sabha. 2.The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "1) Issue a order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent no.1 to decide the revision no. 108/2007 - 2008 Rajdev Vs. Radhey Shyam Yadav under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act expeditiously within the period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court (Annexure No.1)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the aforementioned revisoin filed by petitioners impleading the private respondents as opposite party arising out of suit under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A.& L.R. Act is pending since 2007-08. He further placed certified copy of the order sheet of the pending proceeding, which has been

WRIT - B No. 889 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam