Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - B No. 737 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 737 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 737 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 737 of 2026 Dashrath .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 16 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Singh, Tripathi B.G.Bhai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Tripathi B.G. Bhai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.P. Gupta, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the Case No.REV/5416/2024, Siddharth Nagar (Computerized Case No.AL20141763005416) (Dahrath and Another vs. State of U.P. and Others), under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within the stipulated period." 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that name of the petitioner's father was ordered to be recorded in the place of deceased- Sampati in proper manner. He submitted that restoration application filed by father of private respondent nos.5/1 to 5/4 was allowed and the mutation case, has been decided in illegal manner in maintaining the order of Revenue Inspector dated 28.12.20

WRIT - B No. 737 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam