Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - B No. 726 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 726 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 726 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 726 of 2026 Radha Krishna .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2, Consolidation Officer Padrauna, Kushi Nagar to decide the application Under Rule 109 of U.P.C.H. Act dated 12.10.1989, pending before him within stipulated period." 3. It has been submitted that the aforementioned application is pending consideration for a substantial period of time; however, no efforts are being made to get the same decided expeditiously. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for early disposal of the aforementioned matter. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court

WRIT - B No. 726 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam