Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-20

WRIT - B No. 601 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 601 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 601 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 601 of 2026 Senchan Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus Board Of Revenue U.P. District Prayagraj And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Pratap Singh, Vaishno Poojan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jaishankar Prasad Tyagi, Lallan Chaubey, Ranjana Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. S.P. Singh & Mr. Vaishno Poojan Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Lallan Chaubey & Ms. Ranjana, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3 an Mr. R.C. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition is heard and disposed of finally without inviting counter affidavit. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the Naib Tahsildar vide order dated 28.10.2023 in the proceeding under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 directed to record the name of petitioners (Senchan Yadav and Bechan Yadav) as heirs of Ram Kali wife of Mohan. Against the order of Naib Tahsildar dated 28.10.2023, appeal under Section 35 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was filed by respondent nos.2 & 3 before the Sub- Divi

WRIT - B No. 601 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam