Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - B No. 600 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 600 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 600 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 600 of 2026 Rambali Prajapti .....Petitioner(s) Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Adhar Ram, Vinay Kumar Bharti Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to decide the restoration application No.202554155100001337 dated 10.01.2025, filed by respondent no. 2 in approval order dated 17.12.2012, in reference No. 154 Under section 48 (3) C.H. Act, Village Paligarh, Tehsil-Mohammadabad Gohna, District- Mau, (State Versus Ram Bali), pending before him within stipulated period." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the ca

WRIT - B No. 600 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam