Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-12

WRIT - B No. 576 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 576 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 576 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 576 of 2026 Nisharul Hak .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Vivek Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.C. Srivastava, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent-gaon sabha. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent no.2 to decide Revision No.61 of 2026 (Nisharul Hak vs. State of U.P. and Others), under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending since January, 2026, within the stipulated period" 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that in a suit for partition, preliminary decree was passed in proper manner and kurra was prepared according to the provisions contained under the Code and the Rules framed thereunder. He submitted that restoration application has been filed on misconceived grounds which has been allowed by the Sub

WRIT - B No. 576 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam