Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - B No. 516 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 516 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 516 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 516 of 2026 Vibhav Bhushan Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Tripathi-I Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ballia District-Ballia to decide Reference Case No.122/2025 (Old No.4/12-13) (State vs. Ram Sunder And Others) U/S 48(2) of Consolidation of Holdings Act expeditiously/within time bound period." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition, with a direction to Respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid case strictly i

WRIT - B No. 516 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam