Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - B No. 5002 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 5002 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 5002 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 5002 of 2025 Gyan Chandra Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Dwivedi, Brajesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "I. To Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent. 2 (Consolidation Officer Soraon, District Prayagraj) to decide the restoration application vide Case No. 82 of 2025 (Salik Ram Vs. State), under Rule 109-A of the U.P.C.H. Rules, within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. II. To issue any other suitable writ, order or direction as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. III. Award cost of petition to the petitioners." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriat

WRIT - B No. 5002 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam