Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-05

WRIT - B No. 495 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 495 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 495 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 495 of 2026 Sehzad And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Mohan, Rohit Varma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Babban Singh, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of mandamus, commanding respondent no.2/Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj to decide Recall Application No.25 of 2006-07 (Computerized Case No.AL20071043991138) (Mobin Ahmad vs. State of U.P. and Others), District Lakhimpur Kheri, under Section 331 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, within the stipulated time. 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that second appeal, arising out of the suit under Section 229-B of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, was allowed by the Board of Revenue, maintaining the judgment and decree of the trial court. He submitted that the recall application filed by the private respondent is pending before the respondent no.2 since 2006-07. He also placed the order-sheet of the pending proceeding in order to demons

WRIT - B No. 495 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam