Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-04

WRIT - B No. 449 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 449 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 449 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 449 of 2026 Dayaram And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rabindra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to correct the prayer clause (a) of the writ petition, during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents may be expedited the Revision No.590/193/2026, under Section 48 of C.H. Act Village Sujaula, Tehsil Handia, District Allahabad (Dayaram & Others Versus Sakhtha Prasad & Others) which has been pending from 23.11.2020 before Deputy Director of Consolidation, Allahabad in the interest of justice." 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 5. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it

WRIT - B No. 449 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam