Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-05

WRIT - B No. 403 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 403 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 403 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 403 of 2026 Kishan Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Punya Sheel Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hari Mohan Srivastava, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents and Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent- gaon sabha. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 9.10.2025 passed by respondent no.2 in Revision No.413 of 2025 (Computer Case No.AG2025015000413) (Har Prasad vs. Kishan Singh and Others) (Annexure No.12 to the writ petition)." 3. Counsel for the petitioner states that in the proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, an order was passed by the Tehsildar for recording the name of the private respondent in illegal and arbitrary manner. He submitted that revision was filed on behalf of the petitioner before the Commissioner which was allowed in pa

WRIT - B No. 403 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam