Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - B No. 385 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 385 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 385 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 385 of 2026 Ganesh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Ramdas And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Prajapati, Suresh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "To direct the learned Deputy Director of Consolidation, Fatehpur, to expeditiously decide Revision having Misc. No. 30 of 2024 (Ganesh and others Vs. Ramdas and others) filed under Section 48(1) of Consolidation of Holdings Act along with delay condonation application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, within a time-bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, as mentioned in the writ petition

WRIT - B No. 385 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam