Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - B No. 380 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 380 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 380 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 380 of 2026 Deenanath Goswami .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief: "i. TO ISSUE a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent concerned to conclude the proceedings of connected Appeal No.202354054400000436 (Deenanath and another Vs Vinod and others) the Appeal No.2012540544000043 (Deenanath and others Vs Kripa and others) and the Appeal No.890/962 (Deenanath and others Vs Vishwanath) under Section 21(1) of C.H. Act collectively within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. It has been submitted that the aforementioned matters are pending consideration before the authority concerned for a substantial period of time; however, no efforts are being made to get the same decided at an early date. 4. Learned Standing

WRIT - B No. 380 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam