Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - B No. 379 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 379 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 379 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 379 of 2026 Girja Shankar Pal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamalesh Kumar Nishad, Ram Awadh Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.2 i.e. Consolidation Officer, Brijmanganj, District-Maharajganj to expedite Application dated 16.02.2012 u/S 9A2 of Consolidation of Holdings Act in Case No.465/21-22 (Kawardhari Vs. Bhagahu) as well as Substitution Application dated 28.07.2025, pending before him, expeditiously within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court;" 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspectus as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on t

WRIT - B No. 379 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam