Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - B No. 373 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 373 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 373 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 373 of 2026 Rajdeyi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankur Rai, Vikalp Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2, i.e., the Consolidation Officer, Sadar-II, District-Azamgarh, to decide the Restoration Case No. 146, dated 07.04.2022, in Original Case No. 502, under Section Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, Rajdeyi Vs. Poonam and Others, of Gata No. 1663/3 Area 0.032 Hectare and 1663/2 Area 0.320 Hectare, situated in Village- Saraimohan, Pargana-Beladaulatabad, Tehsil Martinganj, District-Azamgarh (Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition), expeditiously preferably within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection, if a direction is issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously. 4. In this conspec

WRIT - B No. 373 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam