Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-18

WRIT - B No. 36 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 36 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 36 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 36 of 2026 Kaushik Selat .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shankar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anirudh Pratap Singh, Ajeet Kumar Shukla, C.S.C., Sarvesh Kant Shukla Court No. - 55 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Radha Mohan Pandey, learned counsel, holding the brief of Sri Kripa Shankar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anirudh Pratap Singh and Sri Ajeet Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and Sri Ajay Kumar Baranwal, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents. 2. Brief facts of the case are that in the proceeding under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the Naib Tehsildar has passed the order dated 24.5.2023 for recording the name of respondent no.4 on the basis of unregistered will deed dated 7.2.1997. Against the order passed by the Naib Tehsildar dated 24.5.2023, restoration application under Section 209-Ja of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, was filed by the petitioner along with prayer for condonation of delay. The aforementioned delay condonation application as well as restoration application wa

WRIT - B No. 36 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam