WRIT - B No. 339 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 339 of 2026 Vijay Nath .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Mishra, Sudhir Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Sagar Yadav Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the private contesting respondent No. 4, and learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents No. 1 to 3. 2. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and the order proposed to be passed hereunder, this Court proceeds to decide the instant writ petition finally, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties present, without calling for their respective affidavits and without putting notice to the Respondent No. 5, who is a brother of the present petitioner. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.07.2014 passed by the Consolidation Officer, affirmed by Deputy Director of Consolidation vide order dated 24.12.2021 passed in revision, and order dated 17.12.2025 passed in restoration application, whereby an opportunity of the present petitioner to adduce evidenc