Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - B No. 334 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 334 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 334 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 334 of 2025 Dilip Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamal Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 54 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sri Kamal Singh Yadav, learned advocate, counsel for the petitioner, submits that the instant writ petition has been filed for expeditious disposal of objection under Section 9A(2) of the U.P.C.H. Act. The aforesaid proceedings have been decided by the Court concerned; therefore, the instant writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. There is no oppose to the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As such, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) February 2, 2026 Neetu Digitally signed by :- NEETU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - B No. 334 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam